SEC Filing | Forrester Research, Inc

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Definitive Proxy Statement

SCHEDULE 14(A)

(Rule 14a-101)

Information Required in Proxy Statement

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨	Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

þ	Definitive Proxy Statement

¨	Definitive Additional Materials

¨	Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ	No fee required.

¨	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

¨	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

Forrester Research, Inc.

60 Acorn Park Drive

Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140

George F. Colony

Chairman of the Board

and Chief Executive Officer

March 30, 2015

To Our Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Forrester Research, Inc., which will be held on Tuesday, May 12, 2015, at the offices of the Company, 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts at 10:00 a.m. (local time).

On the following pages, you will find the formal notice of the Annual Meeting and our proxy statement. At the Annual Meeting you are being asked to elect two Class III Directors, to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, and to approve by non-binding vote our executive compensation.

We hope that many of you will be able to attend in person. I look forward to seeing you there.

Sincerely yours,

LOGO

GEORGE F. COLONY

Chairman of the Board

and Chief Executive Officer

Forrester Research, Inc.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

May 12, 2015

Notice is hereby given that the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Forrester Research, Inc. will be held at the offices of the Company, 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts at 10:00 a.m. (local time) on Tuesday, May 12, 2015 for the following purposes:

To elect the two Class III directors named in the accompanying proxy statement to serve until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;

To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015; and

To approve by non-binding vote our executive compensation.

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this notice.

Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 26, 2015 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be open to examination by stockholders at the meeting and during normal business hours from May 1, 2015 to the date of the meeting at our offices, located at 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140.

If you are unable to be present personally, please vote your shares as provided in this proxy statement.

By Order of the Board of Directors

LOGO

GAIL S. MANN

Secretary

Cambridge, Massachusetts

March 30, 2015

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOUR SHARES BE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. PLEASE

VOTE YOUR SHARES OVER THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH

THE INSTRUCTIONS SET FORTH ON THE PROXY CARD, OR COMPLETE, SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE WHETHER OR

NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON.

FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

May 12, 2015

PROXY STATEMENT

The Board of Directors of Forrester Research, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is soliciting proxies from our stockholders. The proxy will be used at our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and at any adjournments thereof. You are invited to attend the meeting to be held at 10:00 a.m. (local time) on Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at the offices of the Company, 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts. This proxy statement was first made available to stockholders on or about March 30, 2015.

This proxy statement contains important information regarding our annual meeting. Specifically, it identifies the proposals upon which you are being asked to vote, provides information that you may find useful in determining how to vote and describes voting procedures.

We use several abbreviations in this proxy statement. We call our Board of Directors the “Board”, refer to our fiscal year which began on January 1, 2014 and ended on December 31, 2014 as “fiscal 2014,” and refer to our fiscal year ending December 31, 2015 as “fiscal 2015”. We also refer to ourselves as “Forrester” or the “Company.”

Who May Attend and Vote?

Stockholders who owned our common stock at the close of business on March 26, 2015 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. We refer to this date in this proxy statement as the “record date.” As of the record date, we had 18,053,088 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter to come before the meeting.

How Do I Vote?

If you are a stockholder of record of our common stock:

You may vote over the internet. If you have internet access, you may vote your shares from any location in the world by following the Vote by Internet instructions on the enclosed proxy card.

You may vote by telephone. You may vote your shares by following the “Vote by Telephone” instructions on the enclosed proxy card.

You may vote by mail. If you choose to vote by mail, simply mark your proxy card, date and sign it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

You may vote in person. If you attend the meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person or fill out and return a ballot that will be supplied to you at the meeting.

By voting over the internet or by telephone, or by signing and returning the proxy card according to the enclosed instructions, you are enabling the individuals named on the proxy card (known as “proxies”) to vote your shares at the meeting in the manner you indicate. We encourage you to vote in advance even if you plan to attend the meeting. In this way, your shares will be voted even if you are unable to attend the meeting. Your shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions. If a proxy card is signed and received by our Secretary, but no instructions are indicated, then the proxy will be voted “FOR” the election of the nominees for directors, “FOR” ratifying the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015, and “FOR” approval of the non-binding vote on our executive compensation.

How Do I Vote if My Shares are Held in Street Name?

If you hold shares in “street name” (that is, through a bank, broker, or other nominee), the bank, broker, or other nominee, as the record holder of your shares, is required to vote your shares according to your instructions.

In order to vote your shares, you will need to follow the directions your brokerage firm provides you. Many brokers also offer the option of voting over the internet or by telephone, instructions for which would be provided by your brokerage firm on your voting instruction form. Please follow the instructions on that form to make sure your shares are properly voted. If you hold shares in “street name” and would like to attend the annual meeting and vote in person, you will need to bring an account statement or other acceptable evidence of ownership of our common stock. In addition, if you wish to vote your shares in person, you must contact the person in whose name your shares are registered and obtain a proxy card from that person and bring it to the annual meeting.

What Does the Board of Directors Recommend?

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the election of nominees for Class III directors identified in Proposal One, FOR ratifying the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm as described in Proposal Two, and FOR approval by non-binding vote of our executive compensation as provided in Proposal Three.

If you are a record holder and submit the proxy card but do not indicate your voting instructions, the persons named as proxies on your proxy card will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors. If you hold your shares in “street name”, and you do not indicate how you wish to have your shares voted, your nominee has discretion to instruct the proxies to vote on Proposal Two but does not have the authority, without your specific instructions, to vote on the election of directors or on Proposal Three, and those votes will be counted as “broker non-votes”.

What Vote is Required for Each Proposal?

A majority of the shares entitled to vote on a particular matter, present in person or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum as to any proposal. The nominees for election of the Class III directors at the meeting (Proposal One) who receive the greatest number of votes properly cast for the election of directors will be elected. As a result, shares that withhold authority as to the nominees recommended by the Board will have no effect on the outcome. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and voting is required to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal Two), and to approve the non-binding vote on our executive compensation (Proposal Three).

Shares represented by proxies that indicate an abstention or a “broker non-vote” (that is, shares represented at the annual meeting held by brokers or nominees as to which (i) instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote and (ii) the broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power on a particular matter) will be counted as shares that are present and entitled to vote on the matter for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, but are not considered to have been voted, and have the practical effect of reducing the number of affirmative votes required to achieve a majority for those matters requiring the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and voting (Proposals Two and Three) by reducing the total number of shares from which the majority is calculated. However, because directors are elected by a plurality vote, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome on Proposal One.

May I Change or Revoke My Vote After I Return My Proxy Card or After I Have Voted My Shares over the Internet or by Telephone?

Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you may change or revoke a proxy any time before it is voted by:

•

returning to us a newly signed proxy bearing a later date;

•

delivering a written instrument to our Secretary revoking the proxy; or

•

attending the annual meeting and voting in person.

If you hold shares in “street name”, you should follow the procedure in the instructions that your nominee has provided to you.

Who Will Bear the Cost of Proxy Solicitation?

We will bear the expense of soliciting proxies. Our officers and regular employees (who will receive no compensation in addition to their regular salaries) may solicit proxies. In addition to soliciting proxies through the mail, our officers and regular employees may solicit proxies personally, as well as by mail, telephone, and telegram from brokerage houses and other stockholders. We will reimburse brokers and other persons for reasonable charges and expenses incurred in forwarding soliciting materials to their clients.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting To Be Held on May 12, 2015

This proxy statement and our Annual Report to Stockholders are available on-line at www.edocumentview.com/forr. These materials will be mailed to stockholders who request them.

How Can I Obtain an Annual Report on Form 10-K?

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 is available on our website at www.forrester.com/aboutus. If you would like a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, we will send you one without charge. Please contact Investor Relations, Forrester Research, Inc., 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140, Tel: (617) 613-6000.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table and notes provide information about the beneficial ownership of our outstanding common stock as of February 20, 2015 (except as otherwise noted) by:

(i)

each person who we know beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock;

(ii)

each of the executive officers named below in the Summary Compensation Table;

(iii)

each member of our Board of Directors; and

(iv)

our directors and executive officers as a group.

Except as otherwise indicated, each of the stockholders named in the table below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of our common stock beneficially owned. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and includes voting or investment power with respect to the shares. Shares subject to exercisable options and vesting restricted stock units include options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2015 and shares underlying restricted stock units scheduled to vest within 60 days of February 20, 2015.


	Common Stock Beneficially Owned
Name of Beneficial Owner	Shares Beneficially Owned		Shares Subject to Exercisable Options and vesting restricted stock units		Percentage of Outstanding Shares
George F. Colony c/o Forrester Research, Inc. 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140(1)		7,934,198		—		44	%

Wellington Management Group LLP c/o Wellington Management Company LLP 280 Congress Street Boston, MA 02210(2)		2,443,166		—		13.4	%

BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52^nd Street New York, NY 10022(3)		997,539		—		5.5	%

P2 Capital Partners, LLC 590 Madison Avenue, 25th Floor New York, NY 10022(4)		932,001		—		5.1	%

Henk Broeders		3,583		71,000		*
Robert Galford(5)		18,005		36,625		*
George Hornig		838		21,000		*
Gretchen Teichgraeber		2,833		46,000		*
Michael Welles		11,899		58,500		*
Michael Doyle		7,009		79,875		*
Michael Morhardt		4,541		20,000		*
Lucia L. Quinn		—		7,500
Dennis van Lingen		1,921		41,500		*
Directors, named executive officers, and other executive officers as a group (14 persons)(1)(5)		7,988,970		452,311		45.6	%

(1)	Includes 1,580 shares held by Mr. Colony’s wife as to which Mr. Colony disclaims beneficial ownership.

(2)	Beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2014, as reported in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2015, stating that Wellington Management Company, LLP has shared voting power with respect to 1,913,628 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,443,166 shares.

(3)	Beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2014, as reported in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 2, 2015, stating that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 969,188 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 997,539 shares.

(4)

Beneficial ownership as of January 28, 2015, as reported in a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on January 28, 2015, stating that P2 Capital Master Fund I, L.P. has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 362,138 shares, P2 Capital Master Fund VI, L.P. has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 569,863 shares and P2 Capital Partners, LLC and Claus Moller have shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 932,001 shares.

(5)	Includes 2,633 shares held in trust for Mr. Galford’s adult children, as to which Mr. Galford disclaims beneficial ownership.

*	Less than 1%

PROPOSAL ONE:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes. The members of each class are elected to serve a three-year term with the term of office of each class ending in successive years. Robert M. Galford and Gretchen G. Teichgraeber are the Class III directors whose terms expire at this annual meeting. The Board of Directors has nominated them to serve as Class III directors until the 2018 annual meeting.

The proxies intend to vote each share for which a proper proxy card has been returned or voting instructions received and not revoked in favor of the Class III directors named above. If you wish to withhold the authority to vote for the election of any of the nominees, your voting instructions must so indicate or your returned proxy card must be marked to that effect.

It is expected that Mr. Galford and Ms. Teichgraeber will be able to serve, but if either of them is unable to serve, the proxies reserve discretion to vote, or refrain from voting, for a substitute nominee or nominees.

The following section provides information about each nominee, including information provided by each nominee and sitting director about his or her principal occupation and business experience for the past five years and the names of other publicly-traded companies, if any, for which he or she currently serves as a director or has served as a director during the past five years. In addition to the information presented with respect to each nominee’s and each sitting director’s experience, qualifications and skills that led our Board to conclude that he or she should serve as a director, we also believe that all of our directors, including the two nominees for election at the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders, has demonstrated business acumen and a significant commitment to our company, and has a reputation for integrity and adherence to high ethical standards.

NOMINEES FOR CLASS III DIRECTORS — TERM EXPIRING 2018

Robert M. Galford, age 62, a Class III director, became a director of Forrester in November 1996. Since November 2007, Mr. Galford has been the managing partner of the Center for Leading Organizations, an organizational development firm he founded in Concord, Massachusetts. From 2001 to 2007, Mr. Galford was a managing partner of the Center for Executive Development, an executive education provider in Boston, Massachusetts. We believe Mr. Galford’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his many years of organizational development and executive education experience, along with his more recent corporate governance experience as an instructor for the National Association of Corporate Directors.

Gretchen G. Teichgraeber, age 61, a Class III director, became a director of Forrester in December 2005. Ms. Teichgraeber is the chief executive officer of Leadership Directories, Inc., a premier information services company that publishes biographical and contact data on leaders in the private and public sectors. Previously, Ms. Teichgraeber was an independent consultant to digital media companies and various non-profit organizations from 2007 to 2009. From 2000 to 2007, Ms. Teichgraeber was the chief executive officer of Scientific American, Inc., publisher of the science and technology magazine, Scientific American. Prior to joining Scientific American, Ms. Teichgraeber served as general manager, publishing, and vice president, marketing and information services at CMP Media, Inc., a leading provider of technology news and information. We believe Ms. Teichgraeber’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include her significant general management and marketing experience in the publishing and information services business, including on-line and print media, as well as the gender diversity she brings to our Board of Directors.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

CLASS II DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE UNTIL 2016

Henk W. Broeders, age 62, a Class II director, became a director of Forrester in May 1998. Mr. Broeders has been serving as the chief executive officer of Jaarbeurs, an events and conferences company located in the Netherlands, since October 2013. Mr. Broeders was an independent consultant from February 2013 until October 2013, and previously, from October 2003 until February 2013, Mr. Broeders was a member of the Executive Committee of Cap Gemini S.A., a global management consulting firm headquartered in Paris, France operating under the name CapGemini. From 1998 to 2003, Mr. Broeders served as Chairman of the Executive Board of Cap Gemini N.V., a subsidiary of Cap Gemini S.A. located in the Netherlands. We believe Mr. Broeders’ qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his many years of operational and management experience in the management consulting business, along with his experience with and perspective on European business as a Dutch national who worked for a firm headquartered in France.

George R. Hornig, age 60, a Class II director, became a director of Forrester in November 1996. Mr. Hornig is the Senior Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of PineBridge Investments, an independent investment advisor. From 2006 until November 2010, Mr. Hornig was Managing Director and Co-Chief Operating Officer of Asset Management and the head of Asset Management Americas at Credit Suisse, a global financial services firm, and from 1999-2006, he was the Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of Alternative Investments at Credit Suisse. We believe Mr. Hornig’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his three decades of finance and management experience in the investment banking and private equity business.

CLASS I DIRECTORS CONTINUIING IN OFFICE UNTIL 2017

George F. Colony, age 61, a Class I director, is the founder of Forrester and since 1983, he has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. He also has served as Forrester’s President since September 2001, and he previously was Forrester’s President from 1983 to 2000. We believe Mr. Colony’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors and as its Chairman include his extensive experience in the research industry, including more than 30 years as our chief executive officer, and his significant ownership stake in the Company.

Michael H. Welles, age 60, a Class I director, became a director of Forrester in November 1996. Mr. Welles is chief operating officer, a founder, and director of S2 Security Corporation, an IP-based facility security systems company. Previously, he served as vice president and general manager of the platforms business with NMS Communications, an OEM infrastructure supplier to the telecom industry from 2000 to 2002. We believe Mr. Welles’ qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his considerable knowledge of the information technology industry, his experience as the chief operating officer of a company he co-founded, and his many years of general management experience in global technology companies.

Corporate Governance

We believe that good corporate governance is important to ensure that Forrester is managed for the long-term benefit of its stockholders. Based on our continuing review of the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market, our Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, an amended and restated charter for the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, and a charter for the Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include stock retention guidelines applicable to executive officers and directors. The guidelines require executive officers and directors of the Company to retain at least 50% of the net shares of Forrester common stock delivered to them upon the exercise or vesting of stock-based awards granted on and after January 1, 2010. Net shares are the number of shares remaining after shares are sold or netted to pay the exercise price of stock-based awards and applicable withholding taxes. For directors, the applicable withholding tax is presumed to be the minimum withholding tax applicable to an employee. These guidelines may be waived, at the discretion of the Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors, if compliance with the guidelines would create severe hardship or prevent an executive officer or director from complying with a court order.

We also have a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of our officers, directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and persons performing similar functions. You can access our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and our current committee charters on our website, at www.forrester.com/aboutus.

Information With Respect to Board of Directors

Board Meetings and Committees

Our Board of Directors has determined that each of the current directors, with the exception of Mr. Colony, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is independent under applicable NASDAQ standards as currently in effect.

Our Board of Directors held six meetings during fiscal 2014. Each director attended at least 75 percent of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board of Directors and of each committee of which he or she is a member. Forrester does not require directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. Mr. Colony, who presided at the meeting, and Robert M. Galford attended the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders. Historically, very few stockholders have attended our annual meeting and we have not found it to be a particularly useful forum for communicating with our stockholders. The Board of Directors currently has two standing committees, the Audit Committee and the Compensation and Nominating Committee, whose members consist solely of independent directors.

Our Audit Committee consists of three members: George R. Hornig, Chairman, Henk W. Broeders, and Michael H. Welles, each of whom, in addition to satisfying the NASDAQ independence standards, also satisfies the Sarbanes-Oxley independence requirements for audit committee membership. In addition, the Board has determined that Mr. Hornig is an “audit committee financial expert” under applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and all of the members of the Audit Committee satisfy the financial literacy standards of NASDAQ. The Audit Committee held five meetings during fiscal 2014. The responsibilities of our Audit Committee and its activities during fiscal 2014 are described in the committee’s amended and restated charter, which is available on our website at www.forrester.com/aboutus. The charter will also be made available without charge to any stockholder who requests it by writing to Forrester Research, Inc., Attn: Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140.

Our Compensation and Nominating Committee consists of three members: Robert M. Galford, Chairman, Gretchen G. Teichgraeber, and Michael H. Welles. The Compensation and Nominating Committee held

seven meetings during fiscal 2014. The Compensation and Nominating Committee has authority, as specified in the committee’s charter, to, among other things, evaluate and approve the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, review and approve the compensation of our other executive officers, administer our stock plans, and oversee the development of executive succession plans for the CEO and other executive officers. The committee also has the authority to identify and recommend to the Board qualified candidates for director. The Compensation and Nominating Committee charter is available on our website at www.forrester.com/aboutus. The charter will also be made available without charge to any stockholder who requests it by writing to Forrester Research, Inc., Attn: Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No person who served during the past fiscal year as a member of our Compensation and Nominating Committee is or was an officer or employee of Forrester, or had any relationship with Forrester requiring disclosure in this proxy statement. During the past fiscal year, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors of another entity, any of whose executive officers served as one of our directors.

Board Leadership Structure

At the present time, Mr. Colony serves as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Colony is a significant stakeholder in Forrester, beneficially owning approximately 44% of our outstanding common stock. As such, we believe it is appropriate that he set the agenda for the Board of Directors in addition to serving as the Chief Executive Officer. We also do not believe that the size of the Company warrants the division of these responsibilities. We do not have a single lead director because our Board of Directors is small enough that the independent directors work effectively together as a group and the presiding director at meetings of the independent directors rotates among the chairmen of the committees.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight; Risk Considerations in our Compensation Programs

The Board’s role in the Company’s risk oversight process includes receiving regular reports from members of management on areas of material risk to the Company, including financial, strategic, operational, legal and regulatory risks. The full Board (or the appropriate Committee in the case of risks that are under the purview of a particular Committee) receives these reports from the appropriate manager within the Company. When a committee receives such a report, the Chairman of the relevant Committee reports on the discussion to the full Board during the Committee reports portion of the next Board meeting, enabling the full Board to coordinate the risk oversight role, particularly with respect to risk interrelationships.

Our Compensation and Nominating Committee does not believe that our compensation programs encourage excessive or inappropriate risk taking. We structure our pay programs to consist of both fixed and variable compensation, with the fixed base salary portion providing steady income regardless of our stock price performance. The variable components, consisting of cash bonus and stock-based awards, and for our chief sales officer, sales commissions, are designed to reward both short and long-term performance. Targets under our bonus plans are a function of bookings and profit (described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis below), important financial metrics for our business. For long-term performance, we generally award a combination of time-based stock options and restricted stock units generally vesting over four years. We believe that the variable elements of compensation are a sufficient percentage of overall compensation to motivate executives to produce excellent short and long-term results for the Company, while fixed base salary is also sufficiently high such that the executives are not encouraged to take unnecessary or excessive risks. In addition, our bonus plan funding metrics apply company-wide, regardless of function or client group, which we believe encourages relatively consistent behavior across the organization. While sales commissions are not capped, we cap our bonus at 1.8 times target company performance. Therefore, even if Company performance dramatically exceeds target performance, bonus payouts are limited. Conversely, we have a minimum threshold on Company performance under our executive bonus plan approved by the Compensation and Nominating Committee so that the bonus plan is not funded at performance below a certain level. We also believe that our Executive Severance

Plan adopted in 2014 and described in detail below, which provides severance compensation in the event of involuntary termination of employment without cause and in connection with a change in control, promotes stability and continuity of operations.

Director Candidates

As noted above, the Compensation and Nominating Committee has responsibility for recommending nominees for election as directors of Forrester. Our stockholders may recommend individuals for this committee to consider as potential director candidates by submitting their names and background to the “Forrester Research Compensation and Nominating Committee”, c/o Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140. The Compensation and Nominating Committee will consider a recommended candidate for the next annual meeting of stockholders only if biographical information and background material are provided no later than the date specified below under “Stockholder Proposals” for receipt of director nominations.

The process that the Compensation and Nominating Committee will follow to identify and evaluate candidates includes requests to Board members and others for recommendations, meetings from time to time to evaluate biographical information and background material relating to potential candidates, and interviews of selected candidates by members of the Compensation and Nominating Committee. Assuming that biographical and background material is provided for candidates recommended by the stockholders, the Compensation and Nominating Committee will evaluate those candidates by following substantially the same process, and applying substantially the same criteria, as for candidates submitted by Board members.

In considering whether to recommend any candidate for inclusion in the Board’s slate of recommended director nominees, including candidates recommended by stockholders, the Compensation and Nominating Committee will apply the criteria set forth in the committee’s charter and in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. These criteria include, among others, the candidate’s integrity, age, experience, commitment, diligence, conflicts of interest and the ability to act in the interests of all stockholders. Although the Compensation and Nominating Committee considers as one of many factors in the director identification and nomination process diversity of race, gender and ethnicity, as well as geography and business experience, it has no specific diversity policy. The Compensation and Nominating Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is necessarily applicable to all prospective nominees. We believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities, including direct operating experience, that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities.

In addition, our by-laws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders, other than as part of the Board’s slate. To nominate a director, in addition to providing certain information about the nominee and the nominating stockholder, the stockholder must give timely notice to Forrester, which, in general, requires that the notice be received by us no less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the preceding annual meeting of stockholders. In accordance with our by-laws, the 2016 Annual Meeting will be held on May 10, 2016.

Communications from Stockholders

The Board will give appropriate attention to communications on issues that are submitted by stockholders, and will respond if and as appropriate. Absent unusual circumstances or as contemplated by committee charters, the Compensation and Nominating Committee, with the assistance of the Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, will be primarily responsible for monitoring communications from stockholders and will provide copies of summaries of such communications to the other directors as deemed appropriate.

Stockholders who wish to send communications on any topic to the Board should address such communications to the Forrester Research Compensation and Nominating Committee, c/o Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, Forrester Research, Inc., 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

We have implemented an executive compensation program that rewards performance. Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate the key individuals who are most capable of contributing to the success of our Company and building long-term value for our stockholders. The elements of our executives’ total compensation are base salary, cash incentive awards, equity incentive awards and other employee benefits. We have designed a compensation program that makes a substantial portion of executive pay variable, subject to increase when performance targets are exceeded, and subject to reduction when performance targets are not achieved.

2014 Business Results

In 2014, we made progress on our strategic shift to capitalize on the opportunity presented by the age of the customer. The Company met both its sales plan and its revenue, operating income and earnings per share guidance for the year, with revenues increasing by 5% to $312.1 million.

Compensation for Performance

A substantial amount of the total compensation of our executive officers is linked to our performance, both through short-term cash incentive compensation and long-term equity incentive compensation. We believe this aligns our executives’ incentives with our objective of enhancing stockholder value over the longer term.

Cash Compensation. A significant portion of the current cash compensation opportunity for our executive officers is made through our Amended and Restated Executive Cash Incentive Plan (the “Executive Cash Incentive Plan”). As described in more detail below, payments under the plan are based on company financial performance metrics (for 2014, booked sales accounts or “bookings” and adjusted operating profit). By design, our plan pays more when we perform well and less, or nothing, when we do not. For example, our 2012 operating results were below our expectations and resulted in no payout under the Executive Cash Incentive Plan, while our 2013 operating results were consistent with our targeted levels, resulting in a full payout under the Executive Cash Incentive Plan. In 2014, while our business results were within revenue, operating income and earnings per share guidance for the year, our adjusted operating profit was below the target we set when establishing our 2014 plan. Accordingly, no payout with respect to 2014 performance was made under the Executive Cash Incentive Plan. However, to recognize the progress made in our strategic shift and sales growth, we made discretionary cash awards to our named executive officers at a payout level corresponding to 40% of target cash incentive compensation.

Equity Awards. Another key component of compensation for our executive officers consists of long-term equity incentives, in the form of both restricted stock units (RSUs) and stock options. In 2014, all RSUs and stock options granted to executive officers vest over time, with 25% to vest annually over four years. We believe these awards have retention value and reflect a balance between short-term financial performance and long-term shareholder return, supporting our performance-based compensation. Consistent with past years, we did not grant equity awards in 2014 to George Colony, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who is the beneficial owner of approximately 44% of our common stock.

Compensation Program Changes in 2014

Base Salary and Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation. Based on a review of market data, and taking into account the contributions of the named executive officers in 2013, during its annual executive compensation review our Compensation and Nominating Committee (the “Committee”) left the base salaries of the named

executive officers unchanged from 2013, while increasing the target cash incentive bonus amount of Mr. Colony by 54.3% and the target cash incentive bonus amounts of our other named executive officers eligible for compensation adjustments in 2014 by an average of 10.2% over 2013, as discussed further below. At the same time, the Committee implemented individual performance modifiers that could reduce, but not increase, the 2014 cash incentive bonus amount otherwise payable to Mr. Colony.

Executive Severance Plan. Effective May 15, 2014, our Board of Directors adopted and approved an executive severance plan applicable to all of the Company’s executive officers, including the named executive officers, as discussed in more detail below.

Say on Pay Stockholder Vote. As we have done each year since 2011, in 2014 we submitted our executive compensation program to an advisory vote of our stockholders and, consistent with the results of our previous say on pay votes, it received the support of more than 95% of the total votes cast at our annual meeting. We pay careful attention to any feedback we receive from our stockholders about our executive compensation program, including the say on pay vote. The Committee considered such feedback when setting our executive cash compensation program and granting equity awards to executives in 2014, and will continue to consider stockholder feedback in its subsequent executive compensation decision making.

Compensation Objectives and Strategy

The primary purpose of our executive compensation program is to attract, retain and motivate the key individuals who are most capable of contributing to the success of our Company and building long-term value for our stockholders. Our principal objectives and strategy concerning our executive compensation program are as follows:

•

encourage achievement of key Company values — including client service, quality, collaboration, courage and integrity — that we believe are critical to our continued growth;

•

base cash compensation on individual achievement and responsibility, teamwork, and our short-term financial performance;

•

align employees’ incentives with our objective of enhancing stockholder value over the longer term through long-term incentives, principally in the form of stock options and RSUs; and

•

emphasize individual excellence and encourage employees at all levels, as well as executive officers, to take initiative and lead individual projects that enhance our performance.

These objectives and strategy are reviewed each year by the Committee, which oversees our executive compensation program. In furtherance of these objectives, the Committee takes the following actions each year:

•

reviews the performance of George Colony, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, including his demonstration of leadership and his overall contribution to the financial performance of the Company;

•

reviews the assessment by Mr. Colony of the performance of the other executive officers against their individual and team goals;

•

reviews the company-wide financial goals that are used in the calculation of the cash incentive compensation for our executives;

•

reviews all components of compensation for each executive officer: base salary, short-term cash incentive compensation, and long-term equity incentive compensation;

•

assesses relevant market data; and

•

holds executive sessions (without our management present) as appropriate to accomplish the above actions.

Mr. Colony also plays a substantial role in the compensation process for the other executive officers, primarily by recommending annual goals for the executives reporting directly to him, evaluating their performance against those goals, and providing recommendations on their compensation to the Committee.

The Committee did not engage an independent compensation consultant in 2014 for its general executive compensation analysis because the members were comfortable relying on their independent review of the market data, surveys and other supporting information provided by management, taking into account that the Company does not offer special perquisites, deferred compensation plans, or other special executive compensation arrangements. However, as discussed below, the Committee did consult Pearl Meyer & Partners in 2014 in connection with its evaluation of compensation paid to our chief executive officer, given Mr. Colony’s unique ownership position in the Company. The Committee believes it is adequately experienced to address relevant issues and discharge its responsibilities consistent with the Company’s compensation objectives and philosophy.

The Committee has not historically used formal benchmarking data to establish compensation levels, but has relied instead on relevant market data and surveys to design compensation packages that it believes are competitive with other similarly situated companies or those with whom we compete for talent. While compensation surveys provide useful data for comparative purposes, the Committee believes that successful compensation programs also require the application of sound judgment and subjective determinations of individual and Company performance.

The Committee believes it is helpful to utilize data compiled from a wide array of companies and believes it important to consider comparative data from companies of comparable size and revenue, operating within a comparable industry, and located or operating within our principal geographic markets. In setting executive compensation for 2014, the Committee primarily considered data from the Radford Global High Technology Survey and Kenexa’s IPAS Global High Technology Survey, which included companies with annual revenues from $200 million to $500 million, as well as comparable companies in the geographies applicable to our executives. For each of the Company’s executive officers, other than Mr. Colony, the data the Committee reviewed included comparative market percentiles for base salary and target short-term cash incentive as a percentage of base salary (or “Target Bonus Percentage”). The Committee determined that the base salaries of the named executive officers eligible for compensation adjustments in 2014, other than Mr. Colony, were at or above the 50^th percentile of the comparative market data, while the average Target Bonus Percentage of such named executive officers, other than Michael Morhardt, our Chief Sales Officer, was below the 50^th percentile. In setting 2014 executive compensation, the Committee increased the target short-term cash incentive of each such officer in order to move his or her Target Bonus Percentage closer to the 50th percentile of the applicable comparative market data. In part because Mr. Morhardt’s Target Bonus Percentage, including target sales commissions, exceeded the 50^th percentile of the comparative market data in 2013, the Committee did not make any adjustments to his target short-term cash incentive in 2014.

Since Mr. Colony owns such a substantial percentage of our common stock, the Committee generally does not deem the available market data on chief executive officer compensation as comparable and does not place substantial weight on such data when setting his executive compensation. However, based on comparative data suggesting that target short-term cash incentive was frequently 100% of the chief executive officer’s base salary, the Committee increased the level of Mr. Colony’s Target Bonus Percentage to 100%. In addition, after consultation with Pearl Meyer & Partners, the Committee imposed performance modifiers, discussed below, that result in Mr. Colony’s short-term cash incentive being subject to higher threshold performance than other participants in our Executive Cash Incentive Plan.

Elements of Compensation

Compensation for our named executive officers consists of the following principal components:

•

base salary;

•

short-term cash incentive compensation;

•

long-term equity incentive compensation, in the form of stock options and RSUs;

•

severance and change-of-control benefits; and

•

other benefits available generally to all full-time employees.

We do not have an express policy for weighting different elements of compensation or for allocating between long-term and short-term compensation, but we do attempt to maintain compensation packages that will advance our overall compensation objectives. In reviewing and setting the compensation of each executive, we consider the individual’s position with the Company and his or her ability to contribute to achievement of strategic and financial objectives.

In 2014, as illustrated below, base salaries for our named executive officers other than Mr. Colony represented an average of approximately 36.9% of total target compensation for these individuals, while the base salary for Mr. Colony represented 50% of his total target compensation. Because of Mr. Colony’s significant ownership of our common stock, the Committee generally does not grant stock options or RSUs to him, resulting in a higher ratio of base salary to total target compensation than that of the other named executive officers.

Base Salary. The Committee approves the base salaries of our named executive officers annually by evaluating the responsibilities of their position, the experience and performance of the individual, and as necessary or appropriate, survey and market data. The base salary of a named executive officer is also considered together with the other components of his or her compensation to ensure that both the executive’s total cash compensation opportunity (or “on-target earnings”) and the allocation between base salary and variable compensation for the executive are in line with our overall compensation philosophy and business strategy. Additionally, the Committee may adjust base salary more frequently than annually to address retention issues or to reflect promotions or other changes in the scope or breadth of an executive’s role or responsibilities.

Our goal is to pay base salaries to our named executive officers that are competitive with the base salaries of companies that are similarly situated or with which we compete to attract and retain executives, while taking into account total on-target earnings, and remaining consistent with our overall compensation objectives with respect to variable compensation. In 2014, taking into account the market data discussed above, the Committee decided to leave the base salaries for the named executive officers unchanged from 2013.

Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation. A significant portion of each of our named executive officers’ total annual cash compensation is dependent on our achievement of annual financial objectives set forth under our Executive Cash Incentive Plan. Payouts under the plan are made annually in arrears.

An individual named executive officer’s annual bonus payout under the Executive Cash Incentive Plan is based on the following factors, which are discussed in more detail below:

•

the named executive officer’s target award;

•

the Company’s financial performance; and

•

if applicable, the named executive officer’s individual and/or team performance.

Effective January 1, 2014, as part of its executive compensation reviews, the Committee increased the target cash incentive bonus amounts for each of Mr. Colony, Mr. Doyle and Ms. Quinn by an average of approximately 28.3%, taking into account the Company’s financial performance in 2013, the market data discussed above, and the respective tenures, experience and performance of our named executive officers. The adjustment for Mr. Colony reflected the increase of his Target Bonus Percentage to 100%, subject to the performance modifiers discussed below. Because Mr. van Lingen received an increase in his compensation as part of his promotion to Chief Product Officer in October 2013, he was not eligible for a compensation adjustment until 2015. After giving effect to these increases, the average annual target cash incentive bonus amount for our named executive officers, other than Mr. Morhardt, was approximately 56% of that person’s base salary. Mr. Morhardt’s 2014 target cash incentive bonus amount under our Executive Cash Incentive Plan was $100,000, or 33.3% of his base salary, because as Chief Sales Officer, a significant portion of his target cash incentive amount was tied to sales commissions. Mr. Morhardt’s 2014 commission-based target cash incentive amount was set at $200,000, or 66.7% of his base salary.

For purposes of the Executive Cash Incentive Plan, the financial performance of our Company for 2014 was measured based on booked sales accounts (referred to as “bookings”) and adjusted operating profit goals, the same measures used by the Committee in connection with the Executive Cash Incentive Plan in 2013. The Committee selected bookings as one of the metrics because we believe that bookings provide an important measure of our current business activity and estimated future revenues. The Committee selected adjusted operating profit (“operating profit”), meaning the Company’s pro forma operating profit assuming cash incentive compensation payouts under the Executive Cash Incentive Plan and the Forrester Employee Bonus Plan at target levels, as the other key metric because we believe operating profit provides a comprehensive measure of our financial performance that takes into account the importance of both revenue growth and expense management. In addition, by linking payouts under the plan to the Company’s profitability, we provide our employees with the opportunity to share in our profits while assuring that payouts are only made if we achieve a satisfactory, pre-approved level of profitability, taking into account the nature of our business, planned investments to support growth of the business, and the economic environment. Our pro forma operating profit excludes amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets, reorganization costs, costs associated with acquisition activities, stock-based compensation and net gains or losses from investments. The Committee may also adjust the operating profit metric, as it deems appropriate, to include or exclude particular non-recurring items to avoid unanticipated results and to promote, and provide appropriate incentives for, actions and decisions that are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

The Executive Cash Incentive Plan was structured as follows in 2014:

•

A matrix for 2014 containing bookings on the x axis and operating profit on the y axis was approved by the Committee under the plan based on the Company’s 2014 operating plan approved by the Board of Directors. Minimum bookings and operating profit levels were set taking into account the Company’s recent levels of bookings and operating profit and planned investments to support growth of the business. Failure of our Company to meet either of these minimum levels would result in each executive officer being ineligible to receive any bonus payout. The minimum, target and maximum levels of bookings and operating profit under the Executive Cash Incentive Plan approved by the Committee were as follows (all dollars in thousands):


	Bookings		Operating Profit
Minimum:	$	231,798	$	28,749
Target:	$	304,998	$	32,669
Maximum:	$	341,598	$	39,203

•

If the Company’s target bookings and operating profit were both exactly achieved, the Executive Cash Incentive Plan allowed for the payment of 100% of a named executive officer’s target award.

•

If both bookings and operating profit were above the minimum thresholds but below the target, the bonus payout would be between 10% and 100% of the target award, subject in the case of Mr. Colony to adjustment downward based on individual performance modifiers, as described in more detail below.

•

If one or both of the applicable target bookings and operating profit were exceeded, the plan allowed for the payment of up to 180% of a named executive officer’s target award, subject in the case of Mr. Colony to adjustment downward based on individual performance modifiers.

In 2014, solely with respect to Mr. Colony, the Committee decided to implement individual performance modifiers that could reduce the 2014 bonus payout of Mr. Colony, as determined under the Executive Cash Incentive Plan based on the Company’s performance, to as little as zero. The individual performance modifiers resulted in a higher bookings minimum threshold of $268.4 million for Mr. Colony and required the Company to reach its target bookings amount in order for Mr. Colony to qualify for a 2014 bonus payout equal to or greater than his target award, regardless of how high operating profit was for 2014. The Committee believes that these individual modifiers emphasized growth in bookings, while still maintaining an appropriate level of operating profit.

While the Company’s actual bookings for 2014 were $303.2 million, the Company did not achieve the minimum operating profit level specified above, resulting in 0% of each named executive officer’s target award being payable. Following its determination that no bonuses could be paid to the named executive officers under the Executive Cash Incentive Plan based on our failure to achieve the minimum operating profit level, the Committee evaluated the named executive officers’ performance during the year. Given the overall financial results for the Company in 2014 and the contributions of the named executive officers to implement and support the Company’s strategic initiatives, the Committee determined to award each of them a discretionary cash bonus equal to 40% of their target awards under the Executive Cash Incentive Plan. The actual amounts paid are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table under the heading “Bonus.” In addition, the total cash incentive plan compensation paid to Mr. Morhardt for 2014 included commissions of $200,364, or 100.2% of his targeted commissions for 2014.

Long-term Equity Incentive Compensation. Our equity awards generally consist of stock options and RSUs granted under our equity incentive plan. All stock-based compensation awards granted to our executive officers are granted by the Committee. We believe that stock-based awards help to motivate and retain executives and also align management’s incentives with long-term stock price appreciation. In general, we believe that the combination of RSUs and stock options serves to encourage retention while further aligning the interests of executives and stockholders, as the stock options have value only if our stock price increases from that at grant date, and both the RSUs and stock options have value only if the recipient continues to provide service to the Company through the vesting date. In addition, in structuring the awards, the Committee considered that if and when an RSU award vests, it provides immediate compensatory value to the executive. Neither the Company nor our board of directors, including the Committee, has any plan, program or practice of timing equity incentive awards in coordination with the release or withholding of material non-public information.

In determining the size and nature of stock-based awards for 2014, the Committee considered the aggregate number of stock-based awards outstanding relative to the Company’s total shares outstanding, the average aggregate size of stock-based awards made to executive officers of companies that are similarly situated or with which we compete to attract and retain executives, and the individuals that they believed were most likely to contribute to or influence a return to the Company’s historical growth levels and continued improvement in the Company’s operating margin. On June 26, 2014, the Committee reviewed and approved the grant of time-based RSUs and stock options to each of Ms. Quinn and Messrs. Doyle, Morhardt and van Lingen, effective August 1, 2014, as part of a grant of equity-based compensation to key employees across the Company. With respect to both the stock options and the RSUs, the Committee determined that the awards would vest 25% annually over four years. The stock options were granted at an exercise price of $38.43, which was equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date of August 1, 2014.

Given Mr. Colony’s significant ownership of our common stock, the Committee did not grant stock options or RSUs to Mr. Colony in 2014.

Severance and Change in Control Agreements. Effective May 15, 2014, we adopted the Forrester Research, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”), applicable to all of our executive officers, including the named executive officers. Similar to plans maintained by many other companies, our Severance Plan provides for payments and benefits to our executive officers upon a qualifying termination of employment, including in connection with a change in control. Further detail on the Severance Plan is contained below under the heading “Severance and Change-of-Control Benefits.” We believe that the Severance Plan functions as a retention tool for our executive officers to remain with the Company and enable the executive officers to focus on the continuing business operations and, as applicable, the success of a potential business combination that the Board of Directors has determined to be in the best interests of the shareholders. We believe this results in stability and continuity of operations.

Other Benefits

As employees of our Company, our executive officers are eligible to participate in all Company-sponsored benefit programs on the same basis as other full-time employees, including health and dental insurance and life and disability insurance. In addition, our executive officers are eligible to receive the same employer match under our 401(k) plan (or applicable foreign plan) as is applicable for all participating employees and to participate in our employee stock purchase plan, pursuant to which participants may elect to purchase shares of our stock on a semi-annual basis at a 15% discount based on the lower of the price of our stock at the beginning and end of each period. We do not offer any supplemental executive health and welfare or retirement programs, or provide any other supplemental benefits or perquisites, to our executives.

We have a cash bonus plan adopted in 2000 to pay bonuses measured by a portion of the share of our net profits from two technology-related private equity investment funds. Certain of our key employees, including certain of our executive officers who were employees of the Company at the time of the adoption of this plan, participate in this plan. The principal purpose of this cash bonus plan was to retain key employees by allowing them to participate in a portion of the potential return from our technology-related investments if they remained employed by the Company. The plan was established at a time when technology and internet companies were growing significantly, and providing incentives to retain key employees during that time was important. To date, although we have invested $19.6 million of a $20.0 million commitment in these funds, we have not paid any bonuses under this plan. In May 2013, our Board of Directors approved an extension of this cash bonus plan until June 30, 2015.

Stock Retention Guidelines

In April 2010, we introduced stock retention guidelines as part of our Corporate Governance Guidelines to further align the interests of our directors and executive officers with those of our stockholders. Members of our executive team and Board of Directors are subject to these stock retention guidelines for so long as they remain an executive officer, or serve as a director, of the Company. The guidelines require executive officers and directors of the Company to retain at least 50% of the net shares of Forrester common stock delivered to them upon the exercise or vesting of stock awards granted on and after January 1, 2010. Net shares are the number of shares remaining after shares are sold or netted to pay the exercise price of equity awards and applicable withholding taxes. For directors, the applicable withholding tax is presumed to be the minimum withholding tax applicable to an employee. These guidelines may be waived, at the discretion of the Committee, if compliance with the guidelines would create severe hardship or prevent an executive officer or director from complying with a court order. Our directors and executive officers have complied in full with these guidelines since their initial adoption.

Impact of Tax and Accounting on Compensation Decisions

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the deductibility of compensation paid to certain executive officers in excess of $1 million per year unless the compensation is performance-based. Because the compensation amounts paid to our executive officers are below this threshold, to date we have not needed to structure compensation arrangements with our executive officers to preserve the deductibility of that compensation in light of Section 162(m).

When determining amounts of equity awards to executives and employees under our equity incentive program, the Committee considers the compensation charges associated with the awards. We recognize compensation expense for stock-based awards based upon the fair value of the award. Grants of stock options result in compensation expense equal to the fair value of the options, which is calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Restricted stock unit awards result in compensation expense equal to the fair value of the award on the award date, which is calculated using the closing stock price of the underlying shares on the date of the award, as adjusted to reflect the absence of dividend credits prior to vesting of the restricted stock units. Stock-based compensation is recognized as an expense over the vesting period of the award.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement with management and, based on this review and discussion, recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Compensation and Nominating Committee

Robert M. Galford, Chair

Michael H. Welles

Gretchen G. Teichgraeber

The information contained in the report above shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference in any such filing.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table shows the compensation earned by our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2014. We refer to these officers as the “named executive officers.”


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)(1)		Stock Awards ($)(2)		Option Awards ($)(2)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		All Other Compensation ($)(3)		Total ($)
George F. Colony		2014		367,500		147,000		—		—		—		12,552		527,052
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer		2013 2012		367,500 367,500		— —		— —		— —		238,140 —		12,402 10,596		618,042 378,096

Michael A. Doyle		2014		361,125		75,970		276,300		172,623		—		10,896		896,914
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer		2013 2012		361,125 330,750		— 80,500		203,257 169,050		162,455 147,232		173,875 —		10,875 10,596		911,587 738,128

Michael Morhardt		2014		300,000		40,000		245,612		153,443		200,364		9,318		948,737
Chief Sales Officer		2013		300,000		—		185,604		—		245,599		9,168		740,371

Lucia Luce Quinn		2014		325,000		36,400		214,888		134,263		—		12,552		723,103
Chief People Officer

Dennis van Lingen(4)		2014		348,928		59,816		214,888		134,263		—		27,723		785,618
Chief Product Officer; Chief Europe, Middle East, & Africa Officer		2013 2012		314,952 256,184		— —		116,157 88,339		190,922 101,430		134,979 —		26,105 21,917		783,115 467,870

(1)	Amounts for 2014 represent a discretionary bonus approved by the Committee for each of the named executive officers. Amount for 2012 represents a discretionary bonus approved by the Committee for Mr. Doyle.

(2)

These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock unit and option awards. Assumptions used in the calculation of grant date fair value of stock options are included in footnote 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The grant date fair value of restricted stock units is based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, as adjusted to reflect the absence of dividend credits prior to vesting of the restricted stock units. The amounts set forth may be more or less than the value ultimately realized by the named executive officer based upon, among other things, the value of the Company’s common stock at the time of exercise of the options or vesting of the restricted stock units and whether such options or restricted stock units actually vest.

(3)

2014 amounts include the following amounts of Company matching contributions under our 401(k) plan or, for Mr. van Lingen, our Netherlands-based defined contribution pension plan: Mr. Colony, $7,800; Mr. Doyle, $7,800; Mr. Morhardt, $7,800; Ms. Quinn, $7,800; and Mr. van Lingen, $18,659. Other amounts consist of group term life insurance premiums and miscellaneous other items.

(4)

All elements of Mr. van Lingen’s 2014 compensation, other than stock compensation-related expenses, reflect a translation from euros into U.S. dollars based on an exchange rate of 0.7537 euros per dollar, which was the average exchange rate during 2014. Mr. van Lingen’s compensation for 2013 and 2012 similarly reflect the average exchange rates for each of those years.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR 2014

The following table sets forth information with respect to plan-based awards granted to named executive officers in 2014.


Name	Grant Date		Committee Approval Date		Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)						All other stock awards: Number of shares of stock (#)		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(2)
Name	Grant Date		Committee Approval Date		Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		All other stock awards: Number of shares of stock (#)				Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(2)
George F. Colony		—		—		147,000		367,500		661,500		—		—		—		—

Michael A. Doyle		— 08/01/14 08/01/14		— 06/26/14 06/26/14		18,993 — —		189,925 — —		341,865 — —		— — 7,500		— 22,500 —		— 38.43 —		— 172,623 276,300

Michael Morhardt		— 08/01/14 08/01/14		— 06/26/14 06/26/14		10,000 — —		300,000 — —		N/A — —		— — 6,667		— 20,000 —		— 38.43 —		— 153,443 245,612

Lucia Luce Quinn		— 08/01/14 08/01/14		— 06/26/14 06/26/14		9,100 — —		91,000 — —		163,800 — —		— — 5,833		— 17,500 —		— 38.43 —		— 134,263 214,888

Dennis van Lingen(3)		— 08/01/14 08/01/14		— 06/26/14 06/26/14		14,697 — —		146,971 — —		264,548 — —		— — 5,833		— 17,500 —		— 38.43 —		— 134,263 214,888

(1)

Except with respect to Mr. Morhardt, consists of awards under our Executive Cash Incentive Plan, a non-equity incentive plan, with payouts thereunder made annually in arrears. Our Executive Cash Incentive Plan is described in detail, including calculation of threshold, target and maximum awards under the plan, in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. No award was made to our named executive officers under our Executive Cash Incentive Plan based on 2014 performance; instead a discretionary bonus based on 2014 performance was paid, as reflected in the “Bonus” column of the above Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Morhardt’s “Target” amount includes the target amount he was eligible to receive under our Executive Cash Incentive Plan of $100,000 and target sales commissions of $200,000. There is no cap on Mr. Morhardt’s “Maximum” amount because there is no cap on possible commission payments.

(2)

Assumptions used in the calculation of option awards are included in footnote 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The grant date fair value of restricted stock units is based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, as adjusted to reflect the absence of dividend credits prior to vesting of the restricted stock units.

(3)

Threshold, target and maximum awards under our Executive Cash Incentive Plan for Mr. van Lingen reflect a translation from euros into U.S. dollars based on an exchange rate of 0.76687 euros per dollar, which was the exchange rate that the Company used for all financial planning purposes for 2014. The applicable amounts expressed in euros would be: threshold, €11,271; target, €112,708; and maximum, €202,874. Applying the average exchange rate during 2014 of 0.7537 euros per dollar, which was used to calculate the actual amounts paid in the Summary Compensation Table, the same amounts expressed in U.S. dollars would be: threshold, $14,954, target, $149,540; and maximum, $269,171.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2014 FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table sets forth information for the named executive officers regarding outstanding option awards and stock awards held as of December 31, 2014.


	Option Awards									Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable			Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)			Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(1)
George F. Colony		—		—			—		—		—			—

Michael A. Doyle		— — — 30,000 10,000 14,000 10,500 7,500 4,375 —		— — — — — — 3,500 7,500 13,125 22,500	(5) (6) (7) (8)		— — — 25.20 25.25 29.86 33.03 33.81 36.18 38.43		— — — 09/30/2017 06/30/2019 03/31/2020 06/30/2021 05/13/2022 06/02/2023 07/31/2024		2,500 4,375 7,500 — — — — — — —	(2) (3) (4)		98,400 172,200 295,200 — — — — — — —

Michael Morhardt		— 20,000 —		— 20,000 20,000	(9) (10)		— 27.89 38.43		— 12/02/2022 07/31/2024		6,667 — —	(4)		262,413 — —

Lucia Luce Quinn		— 7,500 —		— 22,500 17,500	(11) (12)		— 37.41 38.43		— 06/30/2023 07/31/2024		5,833 — —	(4)		229,587 — —

Dennis van Lingen		— — — 12,500 10,000 7,125 4,500 2,500 2,500 —		— — — — — 2,375 4,500 7,500 7,500 17,500	(5) (13) (14) (15) (12)		— — — 27.11 29.86 33.03 33.81 36.18 36.84 38.43		— — — 03/31/2018 03/31/2020 06/30/2021 05/13/2022 06/02/2023 09/30/2023 07/31/2024		1,500 2,500 5,833 — — — — — — —	(2) (3) (4)		59,040 98,400 229,587 — — — — — — —

(1)	The market value was calculated based on $39.36, the closing price per share of our common stock on December 31, 2014.

(2)	Consists of time-based restricted stock units that vest as to 50% of the shares subject to the award on each of May 14, 2015 and May 14, 2016.

(3)	Consists of time-based restricted stock units that vest as to one third of the shares subject to the award on each of June 3, 2015, June 3, 2016 and June 3, 2017.

(4)	Consists of time-based restricted stock units that vest as to 25% of the shares subject to the award on each of August 1, 2015, August 1, 2016, August 1, 2017 and August 1, 2018.

(5)	Stock options become exercisable on April 1, 2015.

(6)	Stock options become exercisable as to 3,750 shares on May 14, 2015 and 3,750 shares on May 14, 2016.

(7)	Stock options become exercisable as to 4,375 shares on June 3, 2015, 4,375 shares on June 3, 2016 and 4,375 shares on June 3, 2017.

(8)	Stock options become exercisable as to 5,625 shares on August 1, 2015, 5,625 shares on August 1, 2016, 5,625 shares on August 1, 2017 and 5,625 shares on August 1, 2018.

(9)	Stock options become exercisable as to 10,000 shares on December 3, 2015 and 10,000 shares on December 3, 2016.

(10)	Stock options become exercisable as to 5,000 shares on August 1, 2015, 5,000 shares on August 1, 2016, 5,000 shares on August 1, 2017 and 5,000 shares on August 1, 2018.

(11)	Stock options become exercisable as to 7,500 shares on July 1, 2015, 7,500 shares on July 1, 2016 and 7,500 shares on July 1, 2017.

(12)	Stock options become exercisable as to 4,375 shares on August 1, 2015, 4,375 shares on August 1, 2016, 4,375 shares on August 1, 2017 and 4,375 shares on August 1, 2018.

(13)	Stock options become exercisable as 2,250 shares on May 14, 2015 and 2,250 shares on May 14, 2016.

(14)	Stock options become exercisable as to 2,500 shares on June 3, 2015, 2,500 shares on June 3, 2016 and 2,500 shares on June 3, 2017.

(15)	Stock options become exercisable as to 2,500 shares on October 1, 2015, 2,500 shares on October 1, 2016 and 2,500 shares on October 1, 2017.

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE FOR 2014

The following table sets forth information for the named executive officers regarding the value realized during 2014 by such executives pursuant to option exercises and the vesting of RSUs.


	Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise ($)		Number of shares acquired on vesting (#)		Value realized on vesting ($)
George F. Colony		—		—		—		—
Michael A. Doyle		12,500		171,088		2,709		98,655
Michael Morhardt		—		—		—		—
Lucia Luce Quinn		—		—		—		—
Dennis van Lingen		20,000		280,400		1,584		57,694

Pension Benefits

We have no defined benefit pension plans or long-term incentive plans applicable to the named executive officers.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We have no nonqualified defined contribution or deferred compensation plans.

Severance and Change-of-Control Benefits

Effective May 15, 2014, our Board of Directors adopted and approved the Forrester Research, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”), which is applicable to all of the Company’s executive officers, including the named executive officers. The Severance Plan provides for the payment of severance and other benefits to each executive officer in the event of a termination of employment with the Company without cause and also, in the case of a change in control, by an executive officer for good reason, each as defined in the Severance Plan (each, a “Qualifying Termination”). In the event of a Qualifying Termination and subject to the

executive’s execution of a general release of claims against the Company, in addition to any accrued obligations such as unpaid base salary, vacation and earned bonuses, the Severance Plan provides for the following severance payments and benefits:

•

In the event of a Qualifying Termination other than following a change in control:

•

continued payment of the executive officer’s base salary in installments for one year, and in the case of Mr. Colony (or any successor CEO), for 18 months, after the Qualifying Termination;

•

payment in a lump sum of an amount equal to the lesser of the executive officer’s (x) annual target bonus and, if applicable, sales commissions, as in effect on the date of the Qualifying Termination, or (y) the average of the actual bonus and, if applicable, sales commissions, earned by the executive officer under the applicable plans for the two fiscal years preceding the year of the Qualifying Termination (or for such shorter period that the executive officer was employed by the Company); and in the case of the chief executive officer, payment in a lump sum of an amount equal to one and one-half times the lesser of the chief executive officer’s (x) annual target bonus and, if applicable, sales commissions, as in effect on the date of the Qualifying Termination, or (y) the average of the actual bonus and, if applicable, sales commissions earned by the chief executive officer under the applicable plans for the two fiscal years preceding the year of the Qualifying Termination;

•

payment in cash during the 12-month period following a Qualifying Termination for executive officers other than the chief executive officer, and during the 18-month period following a Qualifying Termination for the chief executive officer, of an amount equal to the Company’s portion of the cost for medical and dental coverage under applicable Company plans; and

•

6 months of outplacement assistance, subject to extension for an additional 6 months upon request of the executive officer and at the discretion of the Company.

•

In the event of a Qualifying Termination during the 18-month period following a change in control (as defined in the Severance Plan):

•

payment in a lump sum of the executive officer’s annual base salary, and in the case of the chief executive officer, two times annual base salary;

•

payment in a lump sum of an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (x) the executive officer’s annual target bonus amount and/or annual target sales commission amount pro-rated as of the Qualifying Termination, over (y) the amount paid or payable for the actual bonus and/or sales commissions earned through the Qualifying Termination;

•

payment of the higher of the executive officer’s (x) target annual incentive opportunity, including target bonus opportunity and, if applicable, target sales commissions, or (y) the average of the actual bonus and, if applicable, sales commissions, earned by the executive under the applicable plans for the two fiscal years preceding the year of the Qualifying Termination (or such shorter period that the executive officer was employed by the Company); and in the case of the chief executive officer, the higher of two times his or her (x) target annual incentive opportunity, including target bonus opportunity and, if applicable, target sales commissions, or (y) the average of the actual bonus and, if applicable, sales commissions, earned by the chief executive officer under applicable plans for the two fiscal years preceding the year of the Qualifying Termination;

•

payment in cash in a lump sum of an amount equal to 12 months for executive officers other than the chief executive officer, and 24 months for the chief executive officer, of the Company’s portion of the cost for medical and dental coverage under applicable Company plans;

•

12 months of outplacement assistance; and

•

without limiting an executive officer’s rights under any equity plans or agreements, accelerated vesting of, or cancellation and payment of merger consideration for (net of exercise price, if any), all unvested equity and equity-based awards, with performance-based awards, if any, vesting at target level of performance.

The Severance Plan shall also reimburse each executive officer whose termination of employment results from a change of control all reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred to obtain or enforce rights or benefits under the Severance Plan if the executive officer prevails in substantial part on the material issues of the proceeding.

The Severance Plan does not provide for a gross-up payment to any of the executive officers to offset any excise taxes that may be imposed on excess parachute payments under Section 4999 (“Excise Tax”) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Instead, the Severance Plan provides that in the event that the severance payments and benefits described above, and any other parachute payments, would, if paid, be subject to the Excise Tax, then the severance payments and benefits under the Severance Plan will be reduced to the extent necessary so that no portion of the payments or benefits under the Severance Plan are subject to the Excise Tax, provided that there shall be no such reduction if the net amount of the payments received by the executive officer after giving effect to all applicable taxes is greater than the net amount of the payments received by the executive officer after giving effect to the reduction.

We entered into an employment offer letter on July 24, 2007 with Mr. Doyle that provides for severance benefits following a termination of his employment by the Company without Cause (as defined in the offer letter). In the event of such a termination, we must continue to pay Mr. Doyle his base salary for the 6 months following his termination, subject to his signing a separation agreement in a form acceptable to us that includes a general release of all claims. On October 5, 2012 we entered into an employment offer letter with Mr. Morhardt that provides for severance benefits following a termination of his employment by the Company without Cause (as defined in the offer letter). In the event of such a termination, we must continue to pay Mr. Morhardt his base salary for the 6 months following his termination, subject to his signing a separation agreement in a form acceptable to us that includes a general release of all claims. On December 3, 2013, in connection with his promotion to Chief Product Officer, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. van Lingen that provides for severance benefits following a termination of his employment by the Company other than for gross misconduct or gross negligence. In the event of such a termination, we must pay Mr. van Lingen an amount equal to the greater of any severance due under applicable Dutch law or the cash severance payable under any then-applicable executive severance plan, subject to his signing a separation agreement in a form acceptable to us that includes a general release of all claims. The Severance Plan provides that there will no duplication of benefits between the Severance Plan and any of Mr. Doyle’s or Mr. Morhardt’s employment offer letters or Mr. van Lingen’s employment agreement. We have not entered into agreements providing for severance benefits with any of the other named executive officers. Each of our named executive officers other than Mr. Colony has entered into stock option and restricted stock unit grant agreements that provide for full acceleration of vesting upon a change of control of the Company, unless there is an assumption, substitution or cash-out of such options or restricted stock units in connection with the change of control.

The following table provides the details of payments that would have been paid to, or value that would have been received by, the named executive officers in connection with either a change of control, a termination of employment without cause or for good reason in connection with a change of control, or a termination of employment without cause in the absence of a change of control, in each case effective as of December 31, 2014.


	Event (1)	Salary Continuation ($)		Annual Incentive Compensation ($)		Payment in Lieu of Medical and Dental ($)		Outplacement Assistance ($)(2)		Value of Accelerated Unvested Equity ($)(3)		Total ($)
George F. Colony	Change in Control		—		—		—		—		—		—
	Termination Upon Change in Control		735,000		1,102,500		33,230		20,000		—		1,890,730
	Not for Cause Termination		551,250		178,605		24,923		10,000		—		764,778
Michael A. Doyle	Change in Control		—		—		—		—		692,243		692,243
	Termination Upon Change in Control		361,125		379,850		10,284		20,000		692,243		1,463,502
	Not for Cause Termination		361,125		86,938		10,284		10,000		—		468,347
Michael Morhardt	Change in Control		—		—		—		—		510,413		510,413
	Termination Upon Change in Control		300,000		399,636		16,615		20,000		510,413		1,246,664
	Not for Cause Termination		300,000		143,567		16,615		10,000		—		470,182
Lucia Luce Quinn	Change in Control		—		—		—		—		289,737		289,737

	Termination Upon Change in Control		325,000		182,000		10,284		20,000		289,737		827,021
	Not for Cause Termination		325,000		41,250		10,284		10,000		—		386,534
Dennis van Lingen(4)	Change in Control		—		—		—		—		486,061		486,061
	Termination Upon Change in Control		348,928		299,080		—		20,000		486,061		1,154,069
	Not for Cause Termination		348,928		67,455		—		10,000		—		426,383

(1)

None of the named executive officers has an agreement to receive any salary continuation, variable cash compensation, benefits continuation, acceleration of equity or gross-up in the event such named executive officer dies, becomes disabled, voluntarily terminates his or her employment with Forrester without “Good Reason” or if that named executive officer is terminated by Forrester for cause.

(2)	Estimated cost of 12 months of outplacement service in the event of a change in control and 6 months of outplacement service in the event of termination without a change in control.

(3)

Calculated using $39.36, the closing price per share of our common stock on December 31, 2014. In the case of unvested options, calculated using the difference between $39.36 and the exercise price of the applicable option, multiplied by the number of unvested shares. In the case of unvested restricted stock units (RSUs), calculated using $39.36 multiplied by the number of shares underlying such unvested RSU.

(4)

Severance amounts for Mr. van Lingen reflect a translation from euros to U.S. dollars based on an exchange rate of 0.7537 euros per dollar, which was the average exchange rate during 2014. Actual amounts payable for severance or in lieu of medical and dental may be higher if so provided by applicable Dutch law.

Director Compensation

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE FOR 2014

The following table shows the compensation that we paid during the year ended December 31, 2014 to each of our directors, other than Mr. Colony, who was not paid additional compensation for his service as a director and whose compensation is reflected in “Executive Compensation” above.


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)(2)(3)		Total ($)
Henk W. Broeders		25,000		116,099		141,099
Robert M. Galford		30,000		116,099		146,099
George R. Hornig		30,000		116,099		146,099
Gretchen G. Teichgraeber		25,000		116,099		141,099
Michael H. Welles		30,000		116,099		146,099

(1)

The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock unit awards for 2014. The grant date fair value of restricted stock units is based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, as adjusted to reflect the absence of dividend credits prior to vesting of the restricted stock units. The amounts set forth may be more or less than the value ultimately realized by the named director based upon, among other things, the value of the Company’s Common Stock at the time of vesting of the restricted stock units and whether such restricted stock units actually vest.

(2)	On May 13, 2014, each of the directors, other than Mr. Colony, received 3,374 restricted stock units.

(3)	At December 31, 2014, the non-employee directors held options to purchase, and restricted stock units for, the number of shares listed next to their names below:


	Number of Shares
Director	Options		RSUs
Henk W. Broeders		74,000		7,794
Robert M. Galford		39,625		7,794
George R. Hornig		24,000		7,794
Gretchen G. Teichgraeber		49,000		7,794
Michael H. Welles		61,500		7,794

Our non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $20,000 and members of each Board committee receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000 for each committee on which they serve, with the Chairman of each committee receiving an additional $5,000 per year. Each of these annual fees is payable quarterly in arrears. Members of our Board of Directors are reimbursed for their expenses incurred in connection with attending any meeting.

The Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors has the authority under the Forrester Research, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (“Equity Incentive Plan”) to grant stock options and RSUs to non-employee directors in such amounts and on such terms as it shall determine at the time of grant. After our 2014 annual meeting, our five non-employee directors at that time each received 3,374 restricted stock units, which equals the number of whole shares calculated by dividing $125,000 by $37.04, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of award. These RSUs vest in four equal annual installments. RSUs granted under the Equity Incentive Plan become vested in full upon a change of control of the Company, unless there is an assumption, substitution or cash-out of such RSUs in connection with the change of control.

Options granted to our non-employee directors prior to our 2006 annual meeting were made pursuant to our Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, and options granted to our non-employee directors prior to our 2012 annual meeting but after our 2006 annual meeting were made pursuant to our 2006 Stock Option Plan for Directors, as amended. Options granted under the 2006 Stock Option Plan for Directors become vested in full upon a change of control of the Company, unless there is an assumption, substitution or cash-out of such options in connection with the change of control.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors has appointed an Audit Committee composed of three non-employee directors: Messrs. Hornig (Chairman), Broeders, and Welles. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is “independent” as defined under the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards. The Board has determined that Mr. Hornig is an “audit committee financial expert” under applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the members of the Audit Committee satisfy the NASDAQ financial literacy standards.

The Audit Committee is responsible for providing independent oversight of Forrester’s accounting functions and internal controls. The Audit Committee oversees Forrester’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors, reviews financial disclosures, and meets privately, outside of the presence of management, with Forrester’s internal auditor and with representatives of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also selects and appoints the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviews the independent registered public accounting firm’s fees. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed Forrester’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 with Forrester’s management and with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Forrester’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). This included a discussion of the independent registered public accounting firm’s judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of Forrester’s accounting principles, and such other matters as are required under the standards of the PCAOB. The Audit Committee also received the written disclosures and letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with that firm.

Based on the Audit Committee’s review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors approved, the inclusion of the audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF

DIRECTORS

George R. Hornig, Chairman

Henk W. Broeders

Michael H. Welles

OTHER INFORMATION

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish to us copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file. Based solely on our review of copies of such forms which we received, we believe that all of our officers, directors, and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied on a timely basis with all filing requirements with respect to transactions during 2014. On February 12, 2015, Wellington Management Group LLP filed an amendment to its previously filed Schedule 13G disclosing that, effective January 1, 2015, it had changed its name from Wellington Management Company, LLP to Wellington Management Group LLP and that its beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2014 had changed from its beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2013, though remained in excess of 10%. Wellington Management Group LLP has not made any filing on Form 4 with respect to this change in beneficial ownership.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Registration Rights and Non-Competition Agreement. At the time of our initial public offering, we entered into a registration rights and non-competition agreement with Mr. Colony which provides that if Mr. Colony’s employment with us is terminated he will not compete with us for the one year period after the date of such termination. The agreement also provides that in the event we propose to file a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to an offering by us for our own account or the account of another person, or both, Mr. Colony shall be entitled to include shares held by him in such a registration, subject to the right of the managing underwriter of any such offering to exclude some or all of such shares from such registration if and to the extent the inclusion of the shares would adversely affect the marketing of the shares to be sold by us. The agreement also provides that Mr. Colony may require us to register shares under the Securities Act with a fair market value of at least $5 million, except that we are not required to effect such registration more than twice or at certain times described in the agreement. The agreement also provides that we will pay all expenses incurred in connection with such registration.

Related Person Transactions

Pursuant to its amended and restated charter, our Audit Committee has responsibility for the review and approval of all transactions between the Company and any related parties or affiliates of the Company, its officers, and directors.

Related persons can include any of our directors or executive officers, certain of our stockholders, and any of their immediate family members. In evaluating related person transactions, the committee members apply the same standards they apply to their general responsibilities as members of a committee of the board of directors and as individual directors. The committee will approve a related person transaction when, in its good faith judgment, the transaction is in the best interest of the Company. To identify related person transactions, each year we require our directors and officers to complete a questionnaire identifying any transactions with the Company in which the officer or director or their family members have an interest. In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics includes our expectation that all directors, officers and employees who may have a potential or apparent conflict of interest will notify our legal department.

PROPOSAL TWO:

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2015

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP audited our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. Our Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015. Although stockholder approval of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not required by law, our Board of Directors believes that it is advisable to give stockholders an opportunity to ratify this selection.

If stockholders do not approve this proposal at the 2015 annual meeting, our Audit Committee will reconsider its selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. If stockholders do ratify this appointment, the Audit Committee, which has direct authority to engage our independent registered public accounting firm, may appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that the change would be in the best interests of Forrester and our stockholders.

The Audit Committee has approved all services provided to Forrester by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during 2014. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the 2015 annual meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will also be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Independent Auditors’ Fees and Other Matters

The following table presents the aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) and its affiliates for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013.


	Fiscal 2014		Fiscal 2013
Audit Fees(1)	$	1,154,719	$	1,280.531
Audit-Related Fees(2)	$	—	$	—
Tax Fees(3)	$	117,696	$	163,691
All Other Fees(4)	$	1,800	$	1,800

Total Fees	$	1,274,215	$	1,446,022

(1)

Audit fees are fees related to professional services rendered by PwC and its affiliates in connection with the audit of our financial statements and our internal controls over financial reporting, the reviews of our interim financial statements included in each of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, international statutory audits, and review of other SEC filings.

(2)	Audit-related fees are for assurance and related services by PwC and its affiliates that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements.

(3)	Tax fees are fees billed for professional services related to tax compliance and tax consulting services.

(4)	All other fees include licenses to web-based accounting and finance reference materials.

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures

The Audit Committee approves the engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm to render any audit or non-audit services. At a regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting, management or a representative of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm summarizes the services to be provided by the firm and the fees that will be charged for the services. Thereafter, if new services or dollar amounts in excess of those pre-approved at the meeting are proposed, they are either presented for pre-approval

at the next meeting of the Audit Committee or approved by the Chairman of the Audit Committee pursuant to delegated authority. At subsequent meetings, the Audit Committee is provided a listing of any newly pre-approved services since the last meeting, and an updated projection for the current year of the estimated annual fees to be paid to the firm for all pre-approved audit and permissible non-audit services.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT

THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2015.

PROPOSAL THREE:

NON-BINDING VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We have implemented an executive compensation program that rewards performance. Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate the key individuals who are most capable of contributing to the success of our Company and building long-term value for our stockholders. The elements of our executives’ total compensation are base salary, cash incentive awards, equity incentive awards, severance and change of control benefits, and other employee benefits. We have designed a compensation program that makes a substantial portion of executive pay variable, subject to increase when performance targets are exceeded, and subject to reduction when performance targets are not achieved.

We believe our executive compensation program strikes the appropriate balance between utilizing responsible, measured pay practices and providing incentives to our executives to create value for our stockholders. We believe this is evidenced by the following:

•

The mix of compensation among base salary and cash incentives.

•

Generally our compensation policies and practices are uniform across each of our business units and geographic regions.

•

Our bonus plan for executive officers provides for multiple payout levels based on targets established and approved by our Compensation and Nominating Committee during the first quarter of the applicable plan year.

•

We require that minimum threshold performance targets be achieved before any bonuses under our executive cash incentive plan are paid, and bonus payouts under our executive cash incentive plan are capped.

•

We use multiple performance measures under our executive cash incentive plan, including bookings and operating profit.

•

We currently grant equity-based awards to executives under our equity incentive plan subject to multi-year vesting criteria, and require that the executive remain employed through the vesting date to realize the value of these awards.

The Board endorses the Company’s executive compensation program and recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in this proxy statement under “Executive Compensation”, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tabular and narrative disclosure contained in this proxy statement.

Because the vote is non-binding, neither the Board of Directors nor the Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board will be required to take any action as a result of the outcome of the vote on this proposal. The Compensation and Nominating Committee will carefully consider the outcome of the vote when evaluating future executive compensation arrangements.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Stockholder proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2016 must be received by December 1, 2015 to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for that meeting.

Stockholders who wish to make a proposal at the 2016 annual meeting, other than proposals included in our proxy materials, or who wish to nominate individuals for election as directors, must notify us between January 12, 2016 and February 11, 2016. If the stockholder does not notify us by February 11, 2016, the proxies will have discretionary authority to vote on a stockholder’s proposal brought before the meeting.

OTHER BUSINESS

The Board of Directors has no knowledge of any other matter that may come before the annual meeting and does not, itself, currently intend to present any other such matter.

FORM 10-K

A copy of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission will be sent to stockholders without charge by writing to Forrester Research, Inc., Investor Relations, 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140.



				Electronic Voting Instructions
				Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
				Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.
				VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.
				Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 12:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on May 12, 2015.
						Vote by Internet
						• Go to www.envisionreports.com/FORR
						• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone
						• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website
				Vote by telephone
				• Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone
				• Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message


Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.		x

LOGO

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed, and FOR Proposals 2 and 3.

Election of Directors:

For

Withhold

For

Withhold

01 - Robert M. Galford

02 - Gretchen G. Teichgraeber

*To elect two Class III directors to serve until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

For

Against

Abstain

To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015.

To approve, by non-binding vote, Forrester Research, Inc. executive compensation.


B Non-Voting Items
Change of Address — Please print new address below.	Meeting Attendance
	Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.	¨


C Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below
Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.	Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.	Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
/ /

LOGO

01ZWUC

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

LOGO

Proxy - Forrester Research, Inc.

Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company for an Annual Meeting, May 12, 2015

The undersigned appoints George F. Colony and Gail S. Mann, and each of them, as proxies, each with the power of substitution, and authorizes them to represent and vote all shares of common stock of Forrester Research, Inc. held by the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the offices of Forrester Research, Inc., 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140 at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, May 12, 2015, or any adjournments thereof, for the purposes set forth on the reverse side.

This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed by the undersigned stockholder(s). If no contrary direction is made, the proxy will be voted FOR each of the nominees for director listed in proposal 1 and FOR proposals 2 and 3.

(Continued and to be voted on reverse side.)